I haven't seen it, no. To the best of my knowledge, it was made sufficiently contemporary to the book's original milieu that it could bring in the stuff about Carlos the Jackal and international assassination without being retro.
The 2002 Identity isn't interested in terrorism vs. counter-terrorism so much as... loss of innocence, I think. In a way it almost doesn't matter how Bourne came to be what he is: the mere fact of being that, discovering what he is and what he's done and what that means for a man of feeling, is where the film's emotional intensity lies. You almost don't want him to learn, once you realise there's no possible happy answer about it: you just want him (and Marie) to get away clean and rediscover some kind of innocence.
no subject
The 2002 Identity isn't interested in terrorism vs. counter-terrorism so much as... loss of innocence, I think. In a way it almost doesn't matter how Bourne came to be what he is: the mere fact of being that, discovering what he is and what he's done and what that means for a man of feeling, is where the film's emotional intensity lies. You almost don't want him to learn, once you realise there's no possible happy answer about it: you just want him (and Marie) to get away clean and rediscover some kind of innocence.