Incarnational theology, Pt.2
Apr. 24th, 2007 06:39 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
hawkwing_lbAnd we move on to the mythological-historical argument. And definitions axiomatic or historical. Ye gods and little fishes, all this constant hedging gets old. Very. Quickly.
My head still hurts.
Ouchies. Can we dispense with incarnational Christology entirely, and go directly to the apocalypse, do not pass go, do not collect your get-out-of-hell-free card? Because my [disbelieved-in deity], these guys make this much more freakin' complicated than it needs to be.
It got freakin' boring twenty pages back.
Okay, enough. I comprehend none, no more, none. I've been at this for five hours. Any longer, and I will go bonkers.
Axe-murderingly bonkers.
My head still hurts.
Ouchies. Can we dispense with incarnational Christology entirely, and go directly to the apocalypse, do not pass go, do not collect your get-out-of-hell-free card? Because my [disbelieved-in deity], these guys make this much more freakin' complicated than it needs to be.
It got freakin' boring twenty pages back.
Okay, enough. I comprehend none, no more, none. I've been at this for five hours. Any longer, and I will go bonkers.
Axe-murderingly bonkers.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2007-04-25 02:41 pm (UTC)